Business

Tribunal Orders Liquidation Following High Committee Approval and Rejects Resolution Professional

Originally reported by Taxscan as: NCLT Directs Liquidation on 91.75% CoC Approval; Refuses to Appoint RP as Liquidator Under IBC Amendment

27 Oct 2026, 10:26 am IST · Xecute.finance News Desk

The crisp read

The tribunal mandated liquidation for an entity after the corporate resolution process failed to produce a turnaround plan, securing a ninety-one point seven five percent approval from the committee. Furthermore, the bench declined to designate the existing resolution professional as the liquidator due to recently enacted amendments under the insolvency code.

Why it matters: Insolvency professionals and creditors must note evolving tribunal interpretations regarding liquidator appointments under updated statutory provisions.

Deep dive - the full story

The adjudicating authority issued an order for company liquidation after the corporate insolvency resolution process concluded without securing an approved restructuring plan. This winding-up directive received overwhelming backing, recording a ninety-one point seven five percent majority vote from the committee of creditors. Alongside the closure order, the bench explicitly turned down the request to appoint the sitting resolution professional to head the liquidation proceedings, citing constraints introduced via recent amendments to the insolvency and bankruptcy code.

This ruling clarifies the practical application of updated statutory guidelines governing the transition from a resolution phase to liquidation. By barring the sitting administrator from automatically taking charge as liquidator, the tribunal enforced compliance with amended legislative norms that restrict such appointments. Stakeholders involved in corporate debt restructuring must therefore navigate revised procedural protocols when handling failed resolution cycles and subsequent asset realization phases.

Interested parties must monitor upcoming tribunal directions regarding the selection and seating of a replacement liquidator to oversee asset distribution. Creditors need to review their recovery timelines and coordinate with the newly designated administrator once appointed by the bench. Observers should watch for further clarifications on how these amended statutory provisions will influence future corporate insolvency proceedings.

Source: taxscan.in

This is news/educational content, not investment advice. Xecute.finance is not SEBI-registered. Consult a qualified professional before acting.

Reading the static edition.

The live app adds Ask Xecute, deadline trackers, the daily quiz and one-tap deep dives.

Open this story in the Xecute app →

Xecute.finance · India's AI-powered finance daily · Founded & built by Kanishk Singh Sikarwar