Income Tax

Jaipur Tax Tribunal Quashes Major Transfer Pricing Adjustments For Jewellery Maker

Originally reported by Taxguru as: Income Tax | Berry Ratio Inapplicable to Full-Fledged Jewellery Manufacturer: ITAT Jaipur Deletes ₹105 Crore TP Adjustments

30 Oct 2026, 6:00 pm IST · Xecute.finance News Desk

The crisp read

The Jaipur bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ruled that the Berry ratio does not apply to a full-fledged jewellery manufacturer. Consequently, it deleted transfer pricing adjustments worth ₹105 crore related to sales, while remanding receivables interest for assessment year 2022-23 and excluding transfer pricing additions from minimum alternate tax. This decision provides critical relief for manufacturing enterprises facing inappropriate financial ratio benchmarks during audits.

Xecute Impact Breakdown

For CAs

  • Advise manufacturing clients that the ITAT Jaipur ruling establishes that the Berry ratio is entirely inapplicable to businesses engaged in comprehensive manufacturing operations.
  • Inform clients that transfer pricing additions must be excluded from the computation of the minimum alternate tax.
  • Note that the issue of receivables interest was remanded back to the lower authorities for fresh consideration.

For businesses

  • A fully integrated jewellery manufacturer secured the deletion of sales-related transfer pricing adjustments totaling ₹105 crore for assessment year 2022-23.
  • Independent manufacturing operations are protected from having improper service-sector benchmarks forced upon their operational assessments.

Effective Assessment year 2022-23

Deep dive - the full story

The Jaipur bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal delivered a ruling for assessment year 2022-23 involving a fully integrated jewellery manufacturer. The tribunal determined that the Berry ratio is entirely inapplicable to businesses engaged in comprehensive manufacturing operations. It accordingly struck down sales-related transfer pricing adjustments totaling ₹105 crore, while remanding the issue of receivables interest back to the lower authorities for fresh consideration. Furthermore, the tribunal directed the exclusion of transfer pricing additions from the computation of the minimum alternate tax. The Berry ratio typically measures gross profit against operating expenses, serving as a suitable profitability indicator primarily for service providers or low-risk distributors rather than full-scale manufacturers.

When tax authorities apply improper financial ratios to entities that own raw materials, manage comprehensive production processes, and assume substantial market risks, it distorts the arm's length price assessment. In practice, this ruling protects independent manufacturing operations from having inappropriate service-sector benchmarks forced upon their operational margins during transfer pricing audits, shifting the focus back to functional profiles. Tax practitioners representing manufacturing clients should examine ongoing litigation involving profit-level indicator selections and challenge the inappropriate use of intermediary benchmarks. Professionals must monitor the fresh proceedings regarding receivables interest for assessment year 2022-23 and verify that minimum alternate tax computations exclude disputed transfer pricing additions.

Ensuring accurate functional analysis documentation will protect clients from inflated adjustments during future international transaction audits. Bottom line: Verify that transfer pricing benchmarks match your manufacturing client's operational reality to prevent arbitrary tax liabilities.

Source: taxguru.in

This is news/educational content, not investment advice. Xecute.finance is not SEBI-registered. Consult a qualified professional before acting.

Reading the static edition.

The live app adds Ask Xecute, deadline trackers, the daily quiz and one-tap deep dives.

Open this story in the Xecute app →

Xecute.finance · India's one-stop finance platform · Founded & built by Kanishk Singh Sikarwar