Income Tax

Madras High Court Rules MAT Inapplicable to Banks and Grants Higher Depreciation

Originally reported by Taxguru as: Income Tax | Section 115JB MAT Inapplicable to Banks, UPS Eligible for 60% Depreciation: Madras HC

30 Oct 2026, 6:42 pm IST · Xecute.finance News Desk

The crisp read

The Madras High Court has delivered its verdict on the Indian Overseas Bank appeal for assessment year 2007-08. The court held that Section 115JB minimum alternate tax does not apply to banking companies. Additionally, the bench ruled that unpaid leave salary must be disallowed and unabsorbed depreciation on UPS is eligible for a sixty percent rate.

Xecute Impact Breakdown

For CAs

  • Review past assessment orders for assessment year 2007-08 and open litigations involving banking clients.
  • Advise banking clients that Section 115JB minimum alternate tax provisions are inapplicable to banking companies based on the Madras High Court ruling.
  • Note that unpaid leave salary is disallowed as a deduction while unabsorbed depreciation on UPS is eligible for the higher rate of sixty percent.

For businesses

  • Banking companies are not subject to Section 115JB minimum alternate tax provisions according to the Madras High Court judgment for assessment year 2007-08.
  • Unpaid leave salary is disallowed as a business deduction.
  • Unabsorbed depreciation on UPS qualifies for the higher rate of sixty percent.

Deep dive - the full story

The Madras High Court has resolved the tax appeal of Indian Overseas Bank for assessment year 2007-08, ruling on multiple contentious corporate taxation issues. The court determined that Section 115JB minimum alternate tax provisions are inapplicable to banking companies. Furthermore, the bench held that unpaid leave salary should be disallowed as a deduction, while simultaneously ruling that unabsorbed depreciation on UPS is eligible for the higher rate of sixty percent. This judgment addresses long-standing disputes regarding the applicability of book profit taxation to institutions governed by specific banking regulations.

In practice, tax authorities frequently sought to subject banks to minimum alternate tax calculations, creating friction with statutory banking frameworks. By confirming that Section 115JB does not apply to banks and clarifying depreciation parameters for technology assets like UPS alongside leave salary disallowances, the court provides definitive guidance for both revenue authorities and banking assessees. Tax practitioners and chartered accountants handling bank audits should review past assessment orders for assessment year 2007-08 and open litigations involving similar Section 115JB demands.

Financial institutions must evaluate their historical depreciation claims on computer peripherals and UPS systems to ensure alignment with the sixty percent depreciation allowance. Finance professionals should monitor further judicial developments concerning banking taxation to safeguard client positions during scrutiny proceedings.

Source: taxguru.in

This is news/educational content, not investment advice. Xecute.finance is not SEBI-registered. Consult a qualified professional before acting.

Reading the static edition.

The live app adds Ask Xecute, deadline trackers, the daily quiz and one-tap deep dives.

Open this story in the Xecute app →

Xecute.finance · India's one-stop finance platform · Founded & built by Kanishk Singh Sikarwar