Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal Dismisses Deposit Plea to Stop Insolvency Proceedings
Originally reported by Taxscan as: NCLAT Rejects ₹89.94 Cr Deposit Offer to Halt CIRP, Holds Financial Creditor Cannot Be Compelled to Settle [Read Order]
4 Nov 2026, 10:13 am IST · Xecute.finance News Desk
The crisp read
The appellate tribunal refused an eighty-nine point nine four crore rupee deposit offer intended to halt corporate insolvency resolution proceedings. It ruled that lenders cannot be forced into settlements and noted issues with forum shopping and statutory restrictions.
Xecute Impact Breakdown
For CAs
- Legal practitioners and resolution professionals must review existing insolvency strategies to ensure compliance with strict statutory withdrawal frameworks under Section 12A.
- Practitioners should note that financial creditors cannot be compelled to accept financial settlements against their commercial wisdom.
For businesses
- Businesses facing corporate insolvency resolution proceedings cannot halt proceedings by offering a deposit of eighty-nine point nine four crore rupees if the financial creditor is unwilling to accept settlement terms.
- Debtors can no longer rely on deposit mechanisms or alternative arrangements to stall proceedings given that financial creditors possess the ultimate prerogative regarding settlement approvals.
Deep dive - the full story
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal dismissed a plea offering a deposit of eighty-nine point nine four crore rupees to halt corporate insolvency resolution proceedings against the corporate debtor. The appellate body based its decision on statutory restrictions under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, observed attempts at forum shopping, and highlighted the financial creditor's clear unwillingness to accept the settlement terms. In insolvency mechanics, corporate insolvency resolution proceedings provide a structured framework for restructuring distressed businesses under creditor supervision.
Previously, debtors could attempt various deposit mechanisms or alternative arrangements to stall proceedings, whereas the current position reinforces that financial creditors possess the ultimate prerogative regarding settlement approvals and cannot be compelled to accept financial settlements against their commercial wisdom. Legal practitioners and resolution professionals must review existing insolvency strategies to ensure compliance with strict statutory withdrawal frameworks under Section 12A.
Stakeholders should closely monitor appellate orders regarding lender autonomy and avoid forum shopping tactics in ongoing litigation matters. Bottom line: Lenders retain absolute discretion over settlement choices, directly impacting the timelines of corporate recovery proceedings.
Source: taxscan.in
This is news/educational content, not investment advice. Xecute.finance is not SEBI-registered. Consult a qualified professional before acting.
Reading the static edition.
The live app adds Ask Xecute, deadline trackers, the daily quiz and one-tap deep dives.
Open this story in the Xecute app →Xecute.finance · India's one-stop finance platform · Founded & built by Kanishk Singh Sikarwar